Judging Procedure

Entries are evaluated by distinguished thought leaders and industry experts, who review the submitted project-related documents. Confidentiality is strictly maintained throughout the process. Winners are determined by the entrant who achieves the highest overall score after several rounds of assessment.

Cybersecurity Symposiums Awarding Session: Crucial Steps​

#1

Initial Screening

Each submission is first reviewed to ensure it meets the established qualification criteria.

#2

Approval and Evaluation

Once a submission passes the initial screening, it is approved and moves on to the evaluation stage.

#3

Feedback for Rejected Entries

Entries that do not meet the criteria receive detailed feedback explaining the reasons for rejection, allowing entrants the opportunity to revise and resubmit.

#4

Merit-Based Evaluation

All approved submissions in each category are then assessed based on predefined parameters, evaluating their individual merits.

#5

Public Voting Process

Approved entries will be subject to a public voting process, allowing the community to participate in selecting the winners.

#6

Final Scoring

The aggregated score for each submission, combined with the results of the public voting, is the primary determining factor in the final decision.

Choose Us

Why Join Awards

Brand Visibility and Recognition

Brand Reputation and Trust​

Regulatory and Compliance

Networking and Industry Connections

    Nominate Now



    Cybersecurity Woman of The YearBest CISO of The YearCybersecurity Innovator of the YearOutstanding Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP)Cybersecurity Excellence of The Year

    Ignite Excellence at the Cybersecurity Symposiums Awards!​

    Empower the future of cybersecurity by sponsoring this exceptional awards and gala evening to drive innovation and excellence in the future of cybersecurity!​